At ADRES, we help clients translate scientific innovation into a clear regulatory plan that supports business goals, investor discussions, clinical execution, and long-term market access. Whether the product is a small molecule, biologic, advanced therapy medicinal product (Cell and Gene Therapy), combination product, or medical device, we define the pathway in a way that is realistic, evidence-based, and commercially aware.
Our work often begins with foundational questions:
That last point matters more than many early-stage companies realize. For selected rare disease programs, orphan planning should be considered as part of the broader regulatory strategy, not as a separate administrative exercise. In the US, this may include Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) with the FDA. In Europe, it may include Orphan Medicinal Product Designation (OMPD) through the EMA framework. These pathways have specific criteria and strategic implications, so they need to be integrated thoughtfully into the wider development plan. (European Medicines Agency (EMA))
We develop regulatory strategies for drug, biologic, and medical device development across major markets. This includes defining the regulatory route, aligning development plans with agency expectations, evaluating evidence gaps, and prioritizing actions that will matter later during submissions and review.
We prepare companies for meaningful engagement with regulators and notified bodies. We support scientific advice meetings, pre-IND meetings, end-of-phase two meetings, classification discussions, briefing packages, meeting strategy, and follow-up communication.
We support the preparation, review, and submission of regulatory documentation across development stages. This includes documents such as INDs, IMPDs, briefing books, pediatric plans, scientific justifications, technical files, and other core regulatory packages needed to move programs forward.
We advise on regulatory opportunities that may accelerate development, reduce uncertainty, or strengthen the product’s positioning. Depending on the program, this may include support for orphan designation strategy, orphan designation request packages, pediatric planning, expedited pathway positioning, and other designation-related activities.
For rare disease products, we help clients assess whether orphan designation is strategically justified, whether the scientific rationale is strong enough, and how to build a defensible regulatory narrative for FDA and EU submissions. Both the FDA and the EMA describe orphan designation as a separate process from product approval that may provide incentives including fee exemptions, tax credits for qualified clinical testing, and the potential for seven years of market exclusivity after approval. In the EU, orphan designation is reviewed against criteria including disease severity, rarity, and significant benefit where relevant. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration)
We conduct regulatory, clinical, CMC, and nonclinical gap assessments to identify weaknesses before they become expensive problems. This is especially valuable before financing rounds, major authority interactions, pivotal studies, or formal submissions.
Regulatory decisions affect more than regulatory documents. We provide ongoing input into indication selection, development sequencing, study planning, manufacturing considerations, evidence generation, and cross-functional decision making so the regulatory strategy remains practical and aligned with execution.
Support across the product lifecycle
ADRES provides regulatory affairs support across all stages of development:
| Regulatory Affairs | Early Stage | Pre-clinical | Clinical | Registration | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Strategy Develop a regulatory strategy for drug development and approval in European, US, Israel and Rest of the World (ROW) | |||||
| Manage interactions with regulatory authorities, balancing client’s strategy and regulatory authorities’ expectations | |||||
| Initiate and perform consultation meetings with regulatory authorities and Notified Bodies, (e.g. scientific advice meetings, pre-IND, EOP2, etc.) throughout the product development lifecycle | |||||
| Prepare and submit regulatory documents, (e.g., IND, IMPD, BLA, MAA, RFD, Technical File, Orphan Designation, Pediatric Plan, expedite programs designations as PRIME and Breakthrough and more) | |||||
| Consult on clinical trial design and interpretation. | |||||
| Writing and Compilation of clinical study documentation (e.g., IB, clinical protocol CSR, etc.) | |||||
| Regulatory, CMC, Pre-clinical and Clinical Gap assessment | |||||
| Indication assessment for the potential drug in development from a scientific and regulatory perspective | |||||
| Planning Non-clinical program including study design and interpretation | |||||
| Product classification according to regulations and classification submissions | |||||
| Provide regulatory input to manufacturing and control processes requirements |
Many companies do not fail because the science is weak. They lose time because the regulatory path was oversimplified, the wrong questions were asked too late, or critical activities were handled in isolation.
We help clients:
For startups, this often means acting as the regulatory function before a full internal team is built. For established companies, it often means adding senior expertise at critical moments when timelines, submissions, or agency interactions carry high stakes.
Why clients involve us early
The best time to strengthen regulatory strategy is before a major milestone, not after a deficiency letter, delayed meeting outcome, or misaligned study design.
Early ADRES involvement can help with:
This is particularly important in rare disease and innovation-driven programs, where small strategic choices can have outsized effects on designation opportunities, study design, and long-term product value. (European Medicines Agency (EMA))
Talk to ADRES about your regulatory strategy.