Navigating Quality Guidelines for Biological Investigational Medicinal Products: A Comparative Analysis of EMA and ICH Q7 Standards 

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) are outlined in several guidelines. For commercial Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), the primary reference is ICH Q7 (Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients). However, when manufacturing biological products during clinical studies in the EU, the quality requirements detailed in ICH Q7 may be overly stringent. It is advisable to refer to the EMA’s guideline on ‘quality documentation for biological investigational medicinal products’. 

The EMA guideline addresses the development and clinical trial phases of biological products such as vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and recombinant proteins. It emphasizes the unique characteristics of biological products, including their complex structures, source materials, and biological activities. 

ICH Q7 covers both chemical synthesis and biological processes but does not delve into the specific complexities of biological manufacturing. In contrast, the EMA guideline provides detailed descriptions of the biological manufacturing process, including upstream processes (e.g., cell culture, fermentation) and downstream processes (e.g., purification, formulation). It also specifies controls and validation for biological processes, considering the variability and complexity inherent in biological production systems. 

Regarding starting materials, ICH Q7 offers general provisions for controlling and documenting raw materials, intermediates, and starting materials for API manufacturing. The EMA guideline, however, provides more specific and detailed requirements for documenting biological starting materials such as cell banks and tissues, including their characterization, qualification, and traceability. 

The EMA guideline also emphasizes extensive characterization and quality control testing specific to biological products, including assays for biological activity, immunogenicity, and structural integrity. This is due to the complex nature of biological molecules. In contrast, ICH Q7 focuses on general GMP principles for quality control and testing. 

An important addition in the EMA’s biological guideline pertains to stability and shelf life determination. The guideline allows for extending the shelf life beyond the period covered by real-time stability data, provided it is supported by relevant data, including accelerated stability studies or stability data generated with representative material. The maximum extension should not exceed double the initial period or more than twelve months longer than the period covered by real-time stability data obtained with representative batches. This provision is crucial during the clinical phases of product development when limited stability data is available. 

In summary, the EMA guideline on quality documentation for biological investigational medicinal products and ICH Q7 serve different but complementary purposes in the regulation of medicinal products. The EMA guideline provides detailed requirements tailored to the complexities of biological products, while ICH Q7 offers broad GMP principles applicable to both chemical and biological APIs. 

About the author

Tamar Oved
QA and CMC Director at ADRES Advanced Regulatory Services

Tamar has over fifteen years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. She is experienced in quality assurance, quality control and manufacturing of drugs and biological products. She oversees GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices), GLP (Good Laboratory Practices) and CMC (Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls) activities at production or testing sites. Tamar also has experience with aseptic processes. 

Linkedin
Go back to the Magazine

Subscribe Now to the Bio-Startup Standard

Notify me for the next issue!

    Skip to content